The
national plea for equality has made me think about equality in a new way.
Recently, I had a bad reaction to a medication. My nephew, in graduate school,
did some research and discovered that it had only been tested on males—so how
it would impact females was unknown. I think that is inequality for women
regardless of their skin tones. What do you know about this? Equality needs to
be recognized for all races and skin tones—AND I think it is a much larger
problem than that . . . Please comment.
It has been traditional to use
male subjects (whether mouse, rat, monkey, or human) because, as one male
researcher told me, the fluctuations of hormones in a female would clutter up
the conclusions. I responded by saying that this was precisely the reason
females need to be used as research subjects at least equally with males (by later
adulthood females tend to outnumber males). How do medications and treatments
impact a female with her fluctuations of hormones, as he put it? Very
differently if anecdotal reports are representative. More tomorrow.
No comments:
Post a Comment